Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja Dan Kompetensi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Dinas Perumahan Kawasan Permukiman Dan Pertanahan Kabupaten Cilacap

Authors

  • Dian Rachmawati Prasetyaningrum Universitas Galuh
  • Enas Enas Universitas Galuh
  • Irma Bastaman Universitas Galuh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/jumaket.v1i1.435

Keywords:

Motivation, competence, employee performance

Abstract

Regarding the implementation of employee performance of the Housing, Residential Areas and Land Agency of Cilacap Regency, it is marked by the fact that there are still delays in completing tasks and work for employees. This results in delays in providing reports on their tasks and work to the leadership, and low employee awareness of the tasks/obligations that are their responsibility and inadequate employee abilities for the tasks assigned to the work apparatus.

The formulation of the problem proposed in this study includes: 1. How does work motivation affect employee performance? 2. How does competence affect employee performance? 3. How much influence do work motivation and competence have on employee performance?

The method used in this study uses a quantitative method. To analyze it, using statistical correlation and multiple regression test data analysis using the SPSS program.

The results of the analysis prove that motivation has a positive and significant effect on employee performance. This means that the higher the motivation, the higher the employee performance, this is evidenced by the results of the analysis of the contribution data of X1 to Y with a coefficient of determination (r2) of 0.407 (40.7%) and then competence has a positive and significant effect on employee performance. This means that the higher the competence, the higher the employee performance, this is evidenced by the results of the analysis of the contribution data of X2 to Y with a coefficient of determination (r2) of 0.453 (45.3%). Furthermore, motivation and competence have a positive and significant effect on employee performance. This means that if there is motivation and competence, then employee performance will also increase. This is evidenced by the results of the analysis which states the contribution of variables X1 and X2 to Y with a correlation (r) of 0.722. If consulted with the table of interpretation values ​​r, then the level of relationship between X1 and X2 to Y is included in the fairly strong category. The coefficient of determination (r2) is 0.521 which means that motivation and competence affect employee performance by 52.1% while the remaining 47.9% is influenced by other factors outside that are not studied.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ambar Teguh Sulistiyani dan Rosidah. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Graha Ilmu: Yogyakarta

Asih, S.,2009. Disiplin, Pelatihan, Motivasi, Dan Kinerja Karyawan PT. Refconindo Bintang Sejahtera. Jakarta : Universitas Esa Unggul.

Baharun, H., Enas, E., & Noviana, R. L. (2022). Quality Improvement as A Strategy to Build Pesantren’s Brand Credibility. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1583

Bambang Wahyudi. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

Bernardin dan Russel. 2012. Human Resources Management, Mc Graw Hill, New.

Budianto, A., Darmawati Bastaman, I., & Herman, F. (2020). Promotion Mix, Individual Internal Environment, And Purchase Decision Making in Minimarket. In Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen (Vol. 21, Issue 1).

Chaizi Nasucha. 2004. Reformasi Administrasi Publik. Jakarta : PT. Grasindo.

Darna, N., Faridah, E., Lestari, M. N., & Tinia, A. G. (2024). Talent Management in Facing The Demand Of Environmental Changes: A Study In Galuh University. Sosiohumaniora, 26(1), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v26i1.47161

Dharma, Surya. 2005. Manajemen Kinerja. Edisi ketiga. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

Dwiyanto, Agus. 2008. Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta : Gadjah Mada University Press.

Gibson, James L et al. 2013. “Organizations (Behavior, Structure, Processes),”. Twelfth Edition, McGrow Hill.

Glick, Peter, 2002. Women's Employment and Its Relation to Children's Health. USA.

Greendberg, Jerald, Robert A. Barron, 2004. Behavior in Organization, Fourth Edition, Allyn and Bacon, USA

Handoko, Hani T. 2003. Manajemen. Yogyakarta. Penerbit : BPFE.

Hasibuan, H. Malayu SP. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta Penerbit: Bumi Aksara.

Keban, Jeremias T. 2008. Enam Dimensi Strategis Administrasi Publik. Jakarta Penerbit : Bumi Aksara.

Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu AA. 2008. Perencanaan & Pengembangan SDM. Bandung. Penerbit : PT. Refika Aditama.

Mardiasmo. 2009. Perpajakan. Edisi Revisi 2009. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Andi Muljono

Minardi, 2001. Motivasi dan Pemotivasian Dalam Manajemen. Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Muhidin, Ali Sambas dan Abdurahman, Maman. (2007). Analisa Korelasi, Regresi dan Jalur dalam Penelitian. Bandung. Penerbit : Pustaka Setia.

Mulyatini, N., Herlina, E., Akbar, D. S., & Eko Prabowo, F. H. (2023). Analisis potensi pembentukan kawasan industri hasil tembakau dalam perspektif ekonomi. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(1), 334. https://doi.org/10.29210/020231920

Mulyatini, N., Herlina, E., Faridah, E., & Rozak, D. A. (1860). Human Capital Management Model: A Perspective of Internal Supervision in Indonesia. Talent Development & Excellence, 12(1), 1860–1868. http://www.iratde.com

Nuryani, L. K., Enas, E., Herman, M., Wahyudi, E., & Dianawati, L. (2022). Teachers’ Perceptions of Academic Supervision in a Pandemic Era; Phenomenological Review. AL-TANZIM: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(3), 679–692. https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v6i3.3646

Pasolong, Harbani. 2007. Teori Administrasi Publik. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Poltak Sinambela dkk. 2006. Reformasi Pelayanan Publik. Jakarta: PT. Salemba Empat.

Prihadi, S. 2004. Kinerja Aspek Pengukuran. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.

Riduwan. 2008. Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Rivai, Veithzal. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.

Robbins SP, dan Judge. 2008. Perilaku Organisasi Buku 2, Jakarta : Salemba Empat.

Robert L. Mathis & John H. Jackson. 2004. Human Resources Management,. Edisi sepuluh. Jakarta : Penerbit Salemba Empat.

Sari, P., Muzaki, I. S., Mulyatini, N., Faridah, E., & Prawiranegara, B. (2019). Local own Revenue, Decentralization and Local Financial Independent. Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia, 19(3), 250. https://doi.org/10.25124/jmi.v19i3.2413

Sedarmayanti. 2007. Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja. Bandung : Pustaka Setia.

Siagian, Sondang P. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta. Penerbit: Bumi Aksara.

Simamora, Henry. 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta : STIE.

Siswanto Sastrohadiwiryo, DR. 2003. Manajemen Tenaga Kerja Indonesia, edisi 2, Jakarta : PT. Bumu Aksara.

Soelaiman. 2007. Manajemen Kinerja. Bandung. Penerbit: CV. Alfabeta

Sugiyono. 2010. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung. Penerbit : CV. Alfabeta

Suryabrata. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian, Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada.

Wibowo. (2008). Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta. Penerbit: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-30

How to Cite

Dian Rachmawati Prasetyaningrum, Enas Enas, & Irma Bastaman. (2024). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja Dan Kompetensi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Dinas Perumahan Kawasan Permukiman Dan Pertanahan Kabupaten Cilacap. Jurnal Manajemen Kewirausahaan Dan Teknologi, 1(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.61132/jumaket.v1i1.435