Peer Review Policy and Process

Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Era Digital (JUMABEDI) applies an Open Peer Review process to enhance transparency and trust in scholarly publishing. This model aims to improve transparency, accountability, and the overall quality of the peer-review process, thereby benefiting authors, reviewers, and the wider academic community.

Open Peer Review Principles

1. Transparent Identity

Reviewer identities are disclosed to the authors to encourage accountability and constructive feedback.

2. Publicly Accessible Reviews

Review reports are published alongside the published articles, allowing readers to view the peer evaluation process and understand the strengths and weaknesses identified by reviewers.

3. Interactive Review

Authors and reviewers can engage in open dialogue during the review process to encourage collaboration and enhance manuscript quality.

4. Reviewer Recognition

Reviewers have the option to sign their reviews and gain public recognition for their contributions to the peer-review process.

5. Ethical Standards

All parties are expected to adhere to ethical guidelines to ensure a fair, respectful, and unbiased review process. Editorial decisions and their justifications are communicated transparently to authors.

Review Process Stages

1

Submission and Technical Check

Once a manuscript is submitted, a technical check is performed to ensure compliance with the journal's formatting guidelines and ethical requirements.

2

Initial Editorial Review

The editorial team conducts an initial review to assess the manuscript's alignment with the journal's focus, scope, and publication standards.

3

Assignment to Editor

If deemed suitable, the manuscript is assigned to an Editor responsible for overseeing the peer-review process.

4

Selection of Reviewers

The Editor identifies and contacts reviewers with expertise in the relevant field to evaluate the manuscript.

5

Review Process

Reviewers provide detailed feedback and recommendations regarding the quality, validity, and scientific contribution of the manuscript.

6

Revision by Author

Based on the reviewers' feedback, authors may be required to revise their manuscripts. This stage may involve multiple rounds of revisions and re-evaluations.

7

Final Decision

The Editor makes a final decision based on the reviewers' recommendations and the results of the author's revisions. Possible outcomes include:

  • Accepted without revisions: The manuscript is accepted in its original form and proceeds to publication preparation.
  • Accepted with minor revisions: The manuscript requires minor corrections within the specified period before publication.
  • Accepted with major revisions: The manuscript requires substantial changes as recommended by the reviewers and/or Editor before an acceptance decision is finalized.
  • Resubmit (conditional rejection): The manuscript may be reconsidered after the author makes significant changes and undergoes another round of evaluation.
  • Rejected (full rejection): The manuscript will not be published or reconsidered, even after major revisions.
8

Publication

Accepted manuscripts enter the publication stage, including copyediting, formatting, and publication in the journal.

Plagiarism screening for manuscripts submitted to this journal is performed with the assistance of Turnitin Application.