Analisis Praktik Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Indonesia Dalam Penyusunan Materialitas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/jukerdi.v1i1.30Keywords:
Public Accounting Firm, Materiality, PracticeAbstract
This research aims to analyze the practices of Public Accounting Firms (KAP) in Indonesia in the process of preparing materiality. Materiality is an important concept in auditing that influences audit decisions and disseminates financial information. This research method involves surveys and data analysis from a number of KAPs operating in Indonesia. The results of this analysis provide in-depth insight into how KAPs in Indonesia view, identify and assess materiality in the audit context. The implications of these findings can provide guidance for practitioners and regulators in improving audit quality in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
AICPA, 1989, ‘Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards Numbers 1to 62’,Chicago, Illinoist: Commerce Clearing House, Inc, p 38.
Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, 2006, Auditing Standard ASA 320: Materiality and Audit Adjustment.
Bernawati, Y 1994,’ Faktor-faktor yang Dipertimbangkan Akuntan Publik Dalam Penentuan Materialitas’, Thesis Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
Blokdiijk,H et al, 2003, ‘Factors Affecting Auditors’ Assessments of Planning Materiality’, Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol.22
Botha, WJJ, Gloeck, JD 1999, ‘A Normative Reference Framework for Determining Audit Materiality’, Article , School of Accountancy University of Pretoria
Dooley, DV1999, ‘Materiality Matters (But Does Materiality, After SAB 99?’
Gaffikin, Michael, 2007, The Critique of Accounting Theory, School of Accounting and Finance, University of Wollongong, paper.
Hadidi, HM 2009, ‘Criteria for Materiality Decisions in Accounting: A Statistical Approach’, Texas Tech University, Disertation.
