Pengaruh Volatilitas Hubungan Politik Bilateral Terhadap Keputusan Investasi Perusahaan Multinasional

Authors

  • Eka Wahyu Kasih Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Kasih Bangsa
  • Ngadi Permana Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Kasih Bangsa
  • Seger Santoso Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Kasih Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/jubid.v1i2.422

Keywords:

Bilateral political volatility, geopolitical risks, investment decisions, multinational corporations, strategic management

Abstract

This study aims to explore the impact of bilateral political volatility on the investment decisions of multinational corporations (MNCs) through a qualitative literature review approach. The analysis reveals that instability in bilateral political relations significantly influences investment decisions, particularly through regulatory uncertainty, geopolitical risks, and disruptions in stakeholder relationships. Companies with strong political connections are better equipped to manage these risks compared to those without similar networks. Mitigation strategies such as geographical diversification and strategic partnerships are identified as key solutions for addressing geopolitical instability. While providing valuable strategic insights, this study is limited to specific geographical and sectoral contexts. These findings highlight the need for further research with broader geographical and sectoral scopes to support strategic decision-making by multinational corporations in increasingly dynamic geopolitical environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albino-Pimentel, J., Dussauge, P., & Shaver, J. M. (2018). Firm non-market capabilities and the effect of supranational institutional safeguards on the location choice of international investments. Strategic Management Journal, 39(10), 2770–2793. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2761

Albino-Pimentel, J., Oetzel, J., Oh, C. H., & Poggioli, N. A. (2021). Positive institutional changes through peace: The relative effects of peace agreements and non-market capabilities on FDI. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(7), 1256–1278. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00428-5

Albino-Pimentel, J., Rodrigues, S. B., & Wood, G. T. (2021). Geopolitical risk and foreign direct investment. Strategic Management Journal, 42(7), 1148–1171. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3256

Arikan, A. M., & Shenkar, O. (2013). National animosity and cross-border alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1516–1544. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0505

Bertrand, O., Betschinger, M.-A., & Settles, A. (2016). Host country political risk and foreign investment strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(5), 574–593. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.10

Bertrand, O., Betschinger, M.-A., & Settles, A. (2016). The relevance of political affinity for the initial acquisition premium in cross-border acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 37(10), 2071–2091. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2412

Boubakri, N., Mansi, S. A., & Saffar, W. (2013). Political institutions, connectedness, and corporate investment. Journal of Corporate Finance, 23, 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.08.006

Boubakri, N., Mansi, S. A., & Saffar, W. (2013). Political institutions, connectedness, and corporate risk-taking. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(3), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.3

Doh, J. P., Lawton, T. C., & Rajwani, T. (2012). Advancing nonmarket strategy research: Institutional perspectives in a changing world. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0149

Fieberg, F., Dorobantu, S., & Khanna, T. (2021). Corporate responses to geopolitical risk: Evidence from multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(4), 710–734. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00453-4

Fieberg, J., Kuo, L., & Zhang, H. (2021). Geopolitical risk, political connections, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 42(3), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3224

Frynas, J. G., Mellahi, K., & Pigman, G. A. (2006). First mover advantages in international business and firm-specific political resources. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.523

Henisz, W. J. (2000). The institutional environment for multinational investment. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 16(2), 334–364. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/16.2.334

Li, J., Strange, R., Ning, L., & Sutherland, D. (2022). Political risk and foreign direct investment: The moderating role of political connectedness. Management International Review, 62(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-022-00474-2

Li, J., Wang, Y., & Li, Z. (2022). The influence of political relations on foreign direct investment: A review and future research directions. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00556-6

Oh, C. H., & Oetzel, J. (2017). Once bitten twice shy? Experience managing violent conflict risk and MNC subsidiary-level investment and expansion. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 714–731. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2542

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Petricevic, O., & Teece, D. J. (2019). The structural reshaping of globalization: Implications for strategic industries and emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(9), 1487–1512. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00215-7

Petricevic, O., & Teece, D. J. (2019). Geopolitical risk, international strategy, and the MNC. Global Strategy and Business Review, 11(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/GSBR-05-2019-0089

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Teece, D. J. (2022). Strategy in the age of geopolitical uncertainty: Managing risk and creating value. California Management Review, 64(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256221102125

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Witt, M. A. (2019). De-globalization and the future of international business. Management and Organization Review, 15(4), 687–704. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2019.48

Witt, M. A. (2019). Multinational firms and geopolitical risk: Emerging research directions. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(9), 1593–1607. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00212-w

Zilja, F., Adarkwah, G. K., & Sabel, C. A. (2022). Do environmental policies affect MNEs' foreign subsidiary investments? An empirical investigation. Management International Review, 62(1), 53–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-021-00364-3

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Eka Wahyu Kasih, Ngadi Permana, & Seger Santoso. (2024). Pengaruh Volatilitas Hubungan Politik Bilateral Terhadap Keputusan Investasi Perusahaan Multinasional. Jurnal Bisnis Inovatif Dan Digital, 1(2), 01–13. https://doi.org/10.61132/jubid.v1i2.422