Tinjauan Studi: Efektivitas Model Expected Credit Loss (ECL) IFRS 9 dalam Mengatasi Procyclicality dan Mendukung Stabilitas Keuangan

Muhammad Rizal; Yessica Amelia; Sarah Fitriyani

doi:10.61132/jubid.v1i1.420

Authors

Muhammad Rizal Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Kasih Bangsa
Yessica Amelia Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Kasih Bangsa
Sarah Fitriyani Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Kasih Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/jubid.v1i1.420

Keywords:

Accounting Policies, Expected Credit Loss (ECL), Financial Stability, IFRS 9, Procyclicality

Abstract

This study examines procyclicality and the Expected Credit Loss (ECL) model in IFRS 9, aiming to analyze the effectiveness of accounting policies in reducing financial instability. Using a qualitative literature review approach, this research reviews various studies related to the implementation of IFRS 9, particularly in the context of the recognition of expected credit losses. The ECL model is expected to reduce the impact of excessive economic cycles by accounting for credit losses from the outset, in contrast to the previous IAS 39 model. While there are challenges in the accuracy of loss estimates and varying implementation across countries, the findings suggest that IFRS 9 has the potential to enhance global financial system stability, provided it is applied carefully. The study also identifies several limitations that need to be considered for further research development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adzis, A. A., Tripe, D. W., & Dunmore, P. (2016). IAS 39, income smoothing, and pro-cyclicality: Evidence from Hong Kong banks. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 8(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-05-2015-0026

Beatty, A., & Liao, S. (2011). Do delays in expected loss recognition affect banks’ willingness to lend? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52, 1–20.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.02.002

Bikker, J. A., & Metzemakers, P. (2005). Bank provisioning behaviour and procyclicality. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 15, 141–157.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2004.03.004

Bouvatier, V., & Lepetit, L. (2008). Banks’ procyclical behavior: Does provisioning matter? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18(5), 513–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2007.07.004

Bouvatier, V., & Lepetit, L. (2012). Provisioning rules and bank lending: A theoretical model. Journal of Financial Stability, 8, 25–31.

Edwards, F. R. (2014). The impact of IFRS 9 on the cyclicality of loan loss provisions. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 22(3), 244-261. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-02-2014-0015

Laeven, L., & Majnoni, G. (2003). Loan loss provisioning and economic slowdowns: Too much, too late? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 12, 178–197.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1042-9573(03)00016-0

Neisen, M., & Schulte Mattler, H. (2021). The effectiveness of IFRS 9 transitional provisions in limiting the potential impact of COVID 19 on banks. Journal of Banking Regulation, 22, 342–351. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-021-00151-7

Pastiranová, O., & Witzany, J. (2022). IFRS 9 and its behavior in the cycle: The evidence on EU countries. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 33, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12140

Smilla Hansen, M., Charifzadeh, M., & Herberger, T. (2023). The impact of IFRS 9 on the cyclicality of loan loss provisions. The Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22669